Investigating the Ability of Fractal Models to Estimate Retention Curve to Improve Water and Soil Resources Management

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran.

2 Professor, Department of Irrigation and Drainage, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Professor, Department of Soil Science, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Soil water retention curve is among the most important properties needed for many soil and water management purposes. Due to high spatial and temporal variability in soils, its direct measurement is rather difficult, time consuming and expensive. Consequently, it would be more feasible to estimate it by using some indirect mathematical methods. The objectives of this investigation are to (1) determine the fractal dimension of the soil retention curve by fitting fractal models to the measurements and (2) investigate the relationship between the fractal dimension and other physical/textural/hydraulic parameters such assoil particle fractions of clay, silt, and sand in large scale. For this purpose, 190 soil samples with broad range of textures from four large agricultural areas were collected, and their particle size distribution, bulk density, organic carbon, salinity, pH, and retention curves were measured. To evaluate the performance of examined fractal models, three statistical parameters including RMSE, RMSD and R2 were used. Results indicated that the fractal dimension has an inverse relationship with soil texture; the finer the soil texture, the greater the fractal dimension. The lowest and greatest fractal dimensions of the Tyler-Wheatcraft model in loamy sand and clay textures were obtained to be 2.38 and 2.74, respectively. These were significant at 1% level based on the Duncan’s multiple range tests. Results further showed that the most accuracy of estimating retention curve in different soil textures by using van Genuchten, Brooks-Corey, and Tyler-Wheatcraft with normalized errors average obtained were 0.06, 1.09, and 3.27, respectively. Furthermore, the obtained R2 values were ranged from 0.88 to 0.99 for Tyler-Wheatcraft and van Genuchten models, respectively. Compares to Brooks-Corey model, the van Genuchten retention model provided better accuracy in estimating retention curve for different soil textures.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Alfaro Soto, M. A., Chang, H. K., and van Genuchten, MTh. (2017). Fractal-based models for the unsaturated soil hydraulic
functions. Geoderma, 306: 144-151.
Arabi, Z., Homaee, M., Asadi, M. E., and Asadi Kapourchal, S. (2017). Cadmium removal from Cd-contaminated soils using some natural and synthetic chelates for enhancing phytoextraction. Chemistry and Ecology, 5: 389-402.
Assouline, S., Tavares-Filho, J. and Tessier, D. (1997). Effect of compaction on soil physical and hydraulic properties: Experimental results and modeling. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 61: 390-398.
Arya, M. L. and Paris, J. F. (1981). A physicoempirical model to predict soil moisture characteristics from particle-size
distribution and bulk density data. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 45: 1023-1030.
Babaeian, E., Homaee, M., Montzka, C., Vereecken, H., Norouzi, A. A. and van Genuchten, MTh. (2016). Soil moisture
prediction of bare soil profiles using diffuse spectral reflectance information and vadose zone flow modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment, 187: 218-229.
Bartoli, F., Genevois-Gomendy, V., Royer, J. J., Niquet, S., Viver, H. and Grayson, R. (2005). A multiscale study of silty soil
structure.European Journal of Soil Science, 56: 207-223.
Brooks, R. H. and Corey, A. T. (1964). Hydraulic properties of porous media. Hydrology. Paper No. 3, Colorado State Univ.
Fort Collins, Co., USA.
Brooks, R. H. and Corey, A. T. (1966). Properties of porous media affecting fluid flow.Journal of Irrigation and Drainage
Engineering, 92: 61-68.
Burdine, N. T. (1953). Relative permeability calculations from pore-size distribution data. Transactions of the American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers 198: 7-71.
Campbell, G. S. (1974). A simple method for determining unsaturated hydraulic conductivity from moisture retention data. Soil Science, 177: 311-314.
Crawford, J.W. (1994). The retention between structure and hydraulic conductivity of soil.European Journal of Soil Science, 45: 493-502.
Dirksen, C. (1991). Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity. In: Smith KA, Mullins C.E., editors, Soil analysis physical methods. New York: Dekker; 69-209.
Eghball, B., Mielke, L. N., Calvo, G. A. and Wilhelm, W. W. (1993). Fractal description of soil fragmentation for various tillage methods. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 57: 1337-1341.
Ghorbani Dashtaki, Sh., Homaee, M. and Khodaverdiloo, H. (2010). Derivation and validation of pedotransfer functions for
estimating soil water retention curve using a variety of soil data. Soil Use and Management ,26(1): 68-74.
Giménez, D., Perfect, E., Rawls, W. J. and Pachepsky, Y. A. (1997). Fractal models for predicting soil hydraulic properties: A
review.Engineering Geology, 48: 161-183.
Hillel, D. (1998). Environmental soil physics. Academic Press, San Diego. 771pp.
Khodaverdiloo, H., Homaee, M., Ghorbani Dashtaki, Sh. and van Genuchten, MTh. (2011). Deriving and validating pedotransfer functions for some calcareous soils. Journal of Hydrology, 399: 93-99.
Kosugi, K. and Hopmans, J. W. (1998). Scaling water retention curves for soils with longnormal pore-size distribution.Soil
Science Society of America Journal, 62: 1496-1504.
Lee, C. K. (2002). Multifractal characteristics in air pollutant concentration time series. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 135: 389-409.
Lee, T. K. and Ro, H. M. (2014). Estimating soil water retention function from its particle-size distribution. Geosciences Journal, 18(2): 219-230.
Lin, D. C. (2008). Factorization of joint multifractality, Physica: 3461-3470.
Millan, H., González-Posada, M., Aguilar, M., Domínguez, J. and Céspedes, L. (2003). On the fractal scaling of soil data, particle-size distributions,” Geoderma, 117: 117-128.
Miller, E. E. and Miller, R. D. (1956). Physical theory for capillary flow phenomena. Journal of Applied Physics, 27: 324-332.
Perfect, E. and Kay, B. D. (1991). Fractal theory applied to soil aggregation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 55: 1552-1558.
Perfect, E., Rasiah, V. and Kay, B. D. (1992). Fractal dimension of soil aggregate-size distribution calculated by number and mass. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56: 1407-1409.
Rasiah, V., Kay, B. D. and Perfect, E. (1992). Evaluation of selected factors influencing aggregate fragmentation using fractal theory.Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 72: 97-106.
Rasiah, V., Kay, B. D. and Perfect, E. (1993). New mass-based model for estimating fractal dimension of soil aggregates,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, 57: 891-895.
Souto, K. M., de Avila, A. L., Cassol, G.V., Machado, S. L. and Marchesan, E. (2015). Phytoremediation of lowland soil
contaminated with a formulatedmixture of Imazethapyr and Imazapic.Journal of RevistaCiênciaAgronômica, 46 (1): 185-192.
Seuront, L., Schmitt, F., Lagodeuc, Y., Schertzer, D. and Lovejoy, S. (1999). Universal multifractal analysis as a tool to characterize multiscale intermittent patterns: Example of phytoplankton distribution in turbulent coastal waters.Journal of Plankton Research, 21: 877-922.
Tuliet, A., Kosugi, K. and Hopmans, J. W. (2001). Similtaneous scaling of soil water retention and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity functions assuming longnormal pore-size distribution. Advances in Water Resources, 24: 677-688.
Turcotte, D. L. (1986). Fractals and fragmentation,Journal of Geophysical Research, 91: 1921-1926.
Tyler, S.W. and Wheatcraft, S. W. (1990). Fractal processes in soil water retention. Water Resources Research, 26(5): 1047-1054. 
Tyler, S. W. and Wheatcraft, S. W. (1992). Fractal scaling of soil particle-size distributions: Analysis and limitations. Soil
Science Society of America Journal, 56(2): 362-369.
van Damme, H. (1995). Scale invariance and hydricbehavior of soils and clays. CR Academic Science Paris, 320: 665-681.
van Genuchten, MTh. (1980). A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44: 892-898.
van Genuchten, MTh., Leij, F. J. and Yates, S. R. (1991). The RETC code for quantifying the hydraulic functions of unsaturated soils. Report No. EPA/600/2-91/065.R.S. Kerr- Environmental Research Laboratory. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ada, Ok. 85 pp.
Veltri, M., Severino, G., De Bartolo, S., Fallico, C. and Santini, A. (2013). Scaling analysis of water retention curves: a multi-fractal approach. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 19: 618-622.
Wang, J., Qin, Q., Guo, L. and Feng, Y. (2018). Multi-fractal characteristics of threedimensional distribution of reconstructed soil pores at opencast coal-mine dump based on highprecision CT scanning. Soil and Tillage
Research, 182: 144-152.
Warrick, A. W., Mullen, G. J. and Nielsen, D. R. (1977). Scaling of field measured hydraulic properties using a similar media concept. Water Resources Research, 13(2): 355-362.
Wu, Q., Borkovec, M. and Sticher, H. (1993). On particle-size distributions in soils,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, 57(4): 883-890.
Young, I. M., Crawford, J. W. and Rappoldt, C. (2001). New method and models for characterizing structural heterogeneity of soil. Soil and Tillage Research, 61: 33-45.
Zarei, Gh., Homaee, M., Liaghat, A.M. and Hoorfar, A. H. (2010). A model for soil surface evaporation based on Campbell’s
retention curve.Journal of Hydrology, 380(4): 356-361.
Zhang, Sh., Grip, H. and Lӧ vdahl, L. (2006). Effect of soil compaction on hydraulic properties of two loess soils in China,” Soil and Tillage Research, 90: 117-125.
Water Productivity Journal
Volume 1, Issue 1
2021
Pages 39-50

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics